Campaigns often spend more money to reach more people. Sharing rewards offer another option: invite people who already completed an experience to share it voluntarily with someone they know.
Why sharing after completion matters
A participant who has watched the video, answered the poll, or completed the survey understands what the link contains. Asking for a share after completion is more natural than asking someone to promote content they have not yet experienced.
AmplePoints Elections can present an optional sharing step after an eligible experience. The participant may earn a one-time reward for sharing, while the campaign can track the number of shares and include the cost in its planned budget.
Make the invitation clear
The best sharing language is simple. Explain what the recipient will see, why the experience may interest them, and that the participant can earn points for an eligible share. Avoid exaggerated claims or language that feels like pressure.
Measure the full path
Sharing should be evaluated beyond the number of links sent. Campaigns should compare shares, new visits, starts, completions, responses, and cost per completed participant. That full path shows whether sharing is producing useful engagement.
Use sharing selectively
Not every message needs a sharing reward. It may be especially useful for short polls, community surveys, event feedback, issue education, campaign announcements, or content designed for broad discussion.
Respect the participant
Sharing must remain optional. The reward should be tied to the sharing action, not to political support, voting behavior, or agreement with the campaign.
When implemented carefully, sharing rewards can turn a completed participant into a voluntary messenger. The campaign gains additional reach, the participant receives value for the extra action, and the new recipient enters a measurable experience rather than an untracked social post.
